Endometriosis Target Discovery
An autonomous AI agent systematically evaluated 178 protein targets for endometriosis drug discovery — reviewing 10,539 papers, filtering by druggability, mechanism, efficacy, and safety. Explore the complete research output below.
How many people do you personally know who have endometriosis?
Reported people known with endometriosis
Based on averages, you likely know around 30 people with endometriosis — most just haven't been diagnosed. The average person knows ~600 people; roughly half are women, and 1 in 10 women have endometriosis.
Endometriosis is estimated to affect 190 million reproductive-age women and girls globally.
Target Landscape
Two views of the 178 targets: a matrix by novelty and druggability, and a scatter plot of confidence vs. druggability colored by novelty.
Novelty vs Druggability Matrix
Target Classes
Functional classification of the 178 targets
Evidence Sources
How targets entered the discovery pipeline
Confidence vs Druggability Score
Each dot is a target. Size = PDB structure count. Color = novelty (purple = novel, amber = emerging, gray = known). Hover for details.
How targets are scored
Every target is graded on two independent 1–3 scales. These aren't annotations — they function as hard selection gates.
Druggability
Structural evidence for small-molecule tractability.
- 3 · High
Ligand-bound co-crystal structure exists, or a clearly defined binding pocket with known small-molecule ligands confirmed by crystallography.
- 2 · Moderate
X-ray structure in the PDB but without co-crystals; known small-molecule binders or chemical probes reported in literature.
- 1 · Poor
No experimental crystal structure.
Gate: only targets scoring 3 satisfy the small-molecule druggability criterion.
Novelty
Clinical development stage. Hybrid phases (e.g., Phase 1/2) round down. Withdrawn, terminated, or suspended trials do not count.
- 2 · Dark / Novel
Most novel. No registered clinical trials at any phase; only academic tool compounds or probes exist.
- 3 · Early Development
Phase 0–2 trials exist for other indications, or Phase 3+ drugs hit the target only as a secondary / off-target effect. Multi-mechanism drugs with 3+ targets default here unless explicitly selective.
- 1 · Clinically Validated
Least novel. A selective or sole-mechanism drug is in Phase 3+ or FDA-approved for any indication, or any drug is in Phase 2+ for the disease under study. Subunits of a complex targeted by a selective Phase 3+ drug also score 1.
Gate: only targets scoring 2 or 3 are acceptable; score 1 targets are excluded.
Target Index
Browse all 178 evaluated targets. Click any card to view the full research report.
About this research
The AI Scientist
Deep Origin's AI Scientist is an autonomous agent conducting drug discovery research for endometriosis, funded through ARIA's AI Scientist program in collaboration with Arctoris (wet lab). The agent documents its reasoning publicly on X (@DOAIScientist).
The Problem
Endometriosis affects ~190 million people worldwide, has a 7–10 year average diagnostic delay, and currently has no approved disease-modifying drug. Existing treatments manage symptoms but don't address the underlying disease biology.
Methodology
The agent built an evidence lake from 10,539 PubMed papers plus ChEMBL, PDB, ClinicalTrials.gov, GEO expression datasets, and UniProt. It extracted 323 candidate targets, filtered to 178 based on druggability and safety, then stress-tested each with standardized evaluation across four phases.
Infrastructure
Built on Deep Origin's computational drug discovery platform including Balto (AI assistant) and DO Patent (document analysis). Research logs and full methodology available on the AI Scientist's X feed.
How you can help (or get help)
Support groups, research organizations, and patient resources
Read more about our science
Deep Origin awarded $31.7M ARPA-H contract to replace animal testing
Building predictive ADME-Tox models with atomistic physics and AI/ML to simulate biological outcomes before a molecule ever touches a living system.
Read announcement → PaperBenchmarking AI-Based Agentic Systems for Autonomous Drug Discovery
Our framework for evaluating AI agents that autonomously design and execute drug discovery workflows.
Read paper → PaperCan AI Agents Design and Implement Drug Discovery Pipelines?
Exploring how autonomous agents can go from target selection through lead optimization.
Read paper → BlogDeep Origin's AI and Physics-Based Models for Drug Discovery
A deep dive into our computational approach combining molecular simulation with machine learning.
Read post → ProductBalto: AI Assistant for Drug Discovery
The conversational AI that powered this research — query databases, dock molecules, and run FEP simulations in plain English.
Learn more → ResourcesAll Papers, Posters & Publications
Browse our full library of research outputs, conference presentations, and technical documentation.
View resources →